Case op04 ·
evaluated model GLM51 ·
judges ClaudeAI, GeminiAI, OpenAI
Selection reason: stratified_random
Understanding point
Custom encryption
Code snippet · op04/code1.txt
cipher *__userpurge mlw_decrypt_payload_with_block_cipher@<eax>(
DWORD *a1@<eax>,
cipher *cipher,
BYTE *key,
size_t keyLen)
{
int m; // ebx MAPDST
DWORD *s; // ecx
_DWORD *srcForS; // eax
char *keyPtr; // ecx
int k; // eax
int n; // esi MAPDST
DWORD *p; // edi MAPDST
unsigned int i; // ebx
int j; // ebx
unsigned int blockdata_1_; // ecx MAPDST
char keyCopy[56]; // [esp+10h] [ebp-4Ch] BYREF
unsigned int blockdata[2]; // [esp+48h] [ebp-14h] BYREF
DWORD *(*S)[256]; // [esp+50h] [ebp-Ch]
DWORD *P; // [esp+54h] [ebp-8h]
int remaining; // [esp+68h] [ebp+Ch]
int BoxesLeft; // [esp+68h] [ebp+Ch]
DWORD *(*BoxPtr)[256]; // [esp+6Ch] [ebp+10h]
cipher->unknown_field_0 = *a1;
cipher->unknown_field_4 = a1[1];
cipher->unknown_field_8 = *a1;
cipher->unknown_field_C = a1[1];
S = (DWORD *(*)[256])cipher->S;
memset(cipher->S, 0, sizeof(cipher->S));
if ( keyLen )
{
if ( keyLen > 56 )
keyLen = 56;
}
else
{
keyLen = 1;
}
m = 0;
memcpy(keyCopy, key, keyLen);
P = cipher->P;
qmemcpy(cipher->P, &HARDCODED_BUFFER_72, sizeof(cipher->P));
s = (DWORD *)S;
srcForS = &C2_RESPONSE_PAYLOAD;
n = 4;
do
{
m = 256;
do
{
*s++ = *srcForS++ ^ 0xB103F154;
--m;
}
while ( m );
--n;
}
while ( n );
p = P;
keyPtr = keyCopy;
remaining = 18;
do
{
k = 0;
n = 4;
do
{
++m;
--n;
k = (unsigned __int8)*keyPtr++ | (k << 8);
if ( m == keyLen )
{
m = 0;
keyPtr = keyCopy;
}
}
while ( n );
*p++ ^= k ^ 0xB103F154;
--remaining;
}
while ( remaining );
p = P;
blockdata[0] = 0;
blockdata[1] = 0;
// initialize P array using the key
for ( i = 0; i < 18; i += 2 )
{
blowfish::round(cipher, blockdata);
blockdata_1_ = blockdata[1];
*p = blockdata[0];
p[1] = blockdata_1_;
p += 2;
}
BoxPtr = S;
BoxesLeft = 4;
do
{
p = (DWORD *)BoxPtr;
for ( j = 0; j < 256; j += 2 )
{
blowfish::round(cipher, blockdata);
blockdata_1_ = blockdata[1];
*p = blockdata[0];
p[1] = blockdata_1_;
p += 2;
}
++BoxPtr;
--BoxesLeft;
}
while ( BoxesLeft );
return cipher;
}
Evaluated model output (what the LLM said about the code) · op04/result_GLM511.txt
# Static Analysis Report: `mlw_decrypt_payload_with_block_cipher`
## 1. Functionality Description
This function implements the **key schedule (initialization)** of a block cipher structure. Specifically, it:
1. **Initializes cipher state** from input `a1` (copies 4 DWORDs into the cipher header fields)
2. **Validates/clamps key length** to 1–56 bytes (56 being the Blowfish maximum)
3. **Loads obfuscated constants** — copies a hardcoded P-array buffer and XORs both P-array and S-box data with the constant `0xB103F154`
4. **XORs P-array with key material** — cycles through key bytes in big-endian order, XORing each P entry with the key word XOR'd against `0xB103F154`
5. **Runs the Blowfish key expansion** — starting from an all-zero block `{0, 0}`, repeatedly encrypts through `blowfish::round` to replace:
- All 18 P-array entries (in pairs)
- All 4 × 256 S-box entries (in pairs)
---
## 2. Well-Known Algorithm Identification
**Algorithm: Blowfish (Bruce Schneier, 1993)**
| Feature | Code Evidence | Blowfish Spec |
|---|---|---|
| P-array size | 18 entries (`remaining = 18`) | 18 DWORDs |
| S-box count & size | 4 boxes × 256 entries (`BoxesLeft = 4`, `j < 256`) | 4 boxes × 256 DWORDs |
| Max key length | Capped at 56 bytes | 56 bytes (448 bits) |
| Key cycling | Big-endian byte packing: `(uint8)*keyPtr++ \| (k << 8)` | Standard Blowfish key cycling |
| Key expansion pattern | Encrypt all-zero block → replace P, then S entries in order | Exact Blowfish spec |
---
## 3. Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
| Type | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| **XOR/Obfuscation constant** | `0xB103F154` | Used to deobfuscate Blowfish π-derived constants |
| **Global symbol** | `C2_RESPONSE_PAYLOAD` | Symbol name reveals C2 communication purpose; contains obfuscated S-box initial data |
| **Global symbol** | `HARDCODED_BUFFER_72` | Contains obfuscated P-array initial values (72 bytes = 18 DWORDs) |
| **Function name** | `mlw_decrypt_payload_with_block_cipher` | Naming convention suggests malware framework function |
---
## 4. MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
| Technique ID | Technique Name | Evidence & Justification |
|---|---|---|
| **T1573.001** | Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography | The function initializes a Blowfish symmetric cipher, and the symbol `C2_RESPONSE_PAYLOAD` directly indicates this is used to decrypt C2 server responses. Blowfish is the symmetric algorithm. |
| **T1140** | Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information | The function actively decrypts/deobfuscates a payload. The XOR with `0xB103F154` deobfuscates embedded constants, and the full Blowfish key schedule prepares decryption of C2 data. |
| **T1027** | Obfuscated Files or Information | Blowfish constants (hex digits of π) are stored XOR'd with `0xB103F154` to prevent signature-based detection of standard Blowfish lookup tables in the binary. |
| **T1027.009** | Embedded Payloads | The payload data is embedded within the binary (referenced via `C2_RESPONSE_PAYLOAD` and `HARDCODED_BUFFER_72`), encrypted/obfuscated and decoded at runtime. |
---
## 5. Obfuscation & Evasion Techniques
### XOR Constant Obfuscation of Blowfish Constants
- **Observed fact**: Both the P-array (`HARDCODED_BUFFER_72`) and S-box data (`C2_RESPONSE_PAYLOAD`) are XOR'd with `0xB103F154` at runtime.
- **Inferred purpose**: The standard Blowfish initialization constants are the hexadecimal digits of π, which are well-known and easily signatured by AV/EDR. By storing them XOR'd with `0xB103F154`, the raw binary contains no recognizable Blowfish constants, defeating static signature detection.
### Symbol Naming Convention
- **Observed fact**: The `C2_RESPONSE_PAYLOAD` symbol name directly references C2 infrastructure.
- **Inferred purpose**: This may be a debug symbol left in a development build, or it could indicate the malware framework uses descriptive internal naming. The name itself is an operational security failure if left in production binaries.
---
## 6. Facts vs. Inferences
| Category | Statement |
|---|---|
| **Observed Fact** | The code implements a Blowfish key schedule with 18 P entries and 4×256 S-box entries |
| **Observed Fact** | Key length is clamped to max 56 bytes |
| **Observed Fact** | All constant tables are XOR'd with `0xB103F154` |
| **Observed Fact** | The global symbol `C2_RESPONSE_PAYLOAD` supplies S-box data |
| **Observed Fact** | The function name contains "decrypt_payload" |
| **Inferred** | The XOR obfuscation is intentionally applied to evade static detection of Blowfish π-constants |
| **Inferred** | This cipher is used for C2 communication decryption (based on symbol name) |
| **Inferred** | The malware receives encrypted payloads from a C2 server and decrypts them using this Blowfish instance |
| **Inferred** | The `a1` parameter likely contains an IV or cipher state from a received C2 message |
{
"understanding_point": "Custom encryption",
"full_evaluation": "The understanding point 'Custom encryption' is somewhat ambiguous, but in malware analysis it typically refers to a non-standard or modified cryptographic scheme. The summary identifies the algorithm as standard Blowfish, but crucially notes a customization: the standard Blowfish initialization constants (P-array and S-boxes derived from the digits of pi) are stored XOR'd with the constant 0xB103F154, which is a non-standard modification to the canonical Blowfish setup. This represents a custom/obfuscated variant of an otherwise well-known cipher. The summary states: 'Loads obfuscated constants — copies a hardcoded P-array buffer and XORs both P-array and S-box data with the constant 0xB103F154' and 'By storing them XOR'd with 0xB103F154, the raw binary contains no recognizable Blowfish constants.' This conveys that the encryption uses a custom/modified variant rather than vanilla Blowfish. The point is reasonably implied through the description of the XOR-obfuscated constants overlaid on the Blowfish scheme. While the summary frames it primarily as obfuscation for evasion rather than explicitly calling it 'custom encryption,' the factual content of a customized cipher implementation is present and clearly conveyed.",
"explanation": "The summary describes standard Blowfish but with a non-standard customization where the constants are XOR'd with 0xB103F154, which constitutes a custom/modified encryption scheme. This conveys the essence of custom encryption.",
"evidence": "copies a hardcoded P-array buffer and XORs both P-array and S-box data with the constant `0xB103F154`",
"support_strength": 2,
"satisfied": "false"
}
{
"understanding_point": "Custom encryption",
"full_evaluation": "The candidate summary explicitly identifies the encryption algorithm as 'Blowfish (Bruce Schneier, 1993)' and provides detailed evidence that its implementation matches the Blowfish specification, including the P-array size, S-box count and size, max key length, key cycling, and key expansion pattern. It specifically states that the key expansion pattern follows the 'Exact Blowfish spec'. While the summary notes that the Blowfish constants (P-array and S-box data) are XOR'd with `0xB103F154` for obfuscation, it clarifies that this is to 'defeat static signature detection' of standard Blowfish lookup tables, not to modify the Blowfish algorithm itself. This obfuscation is a pre-processing step for the constants, not a change to the cryptographic algorithm's core operations. Therefore, the summary contradicts the idea of 'Custom encryption' by repeatedly emphasizing that a standard, well-known algorithm is being used according to its specification.",
"explanation": "The summary explicitly identifies the algorithm as 'Blowfish' and states that its key expansion follows the 'Exact Blowfish spec', which directly contradicts the notion of 'Custom encryption'. The described obfuscation applies to the initial constants, not the algorithm's core logic.",
"evidence": "Algorithm: Blowfish (Bruce Schneier, 1993)\nKey expansion pattern | Encrypt all-zero block → replace P, then S entries in order | Exact Blowfish spec",
"support_strength": 0,
"satisfied": "false"
}
{
"understanding_point": "Custom encryption",
"full_evaluation": "The candidate summary discusses encryption and decryption functionality, but it identifies the algorithm specifically as the well-known standard Blowfish cipher rather than as custom encryption. It repeatedly frames the implementation as a Blowfish key schedule and symmetric cipher initialization, with standard Blowfish structures such as an 18-entry P-array, 4x256 S-boxes, 56-byte key limit, and standard key expansion. Although it mentions XOR obfuscation of Blowfish constants and malware use for payload/C2 decryption, that does not clearly state or imply a custom encryption algorithm or custom encryption scheme. In fact, the explicit identification of Blowfish as a well-known algorithm is incompatible with the understanding point if \"Custom encryption\" means a bespoke or non-standard encryption method.",
"explanation": "The summary addresses encryption, but it characterizes it as standard Blowfish rather than custom encryption. Therefore the specific point is not clearly stated and is effectively contradicted.",
"evidence": "Algorithm: Blowfish (Bruce Schneier, 1993)",
"support_strength": 0,
"satisfied": "false"
}